This is my response to CAT41's TableTalk and its administrator, Rev. Eric Stefanski.
  Just four days before the "First National Free Conference on
  C.F.W. Walther" to be held in St. Louis, I have been banished as a "thief
  and a liar" from the CAT41's TableTalk. This is no coincidence but the reaction of
  many pastors who fear exposure of their rejection of Voter supremacy to the lay people of
  the LCMS.
  In the age of email fellowship email excommunication was inevitable. Hundreds of LCMS
  pastors participating in CAT41's TableTalk believe and teach that Voters' Assemblies, as
  establish by C.F.W. Walther, are not necessary in LCMS congregations. We have debated this
  issue for many months on their mail list.
  In order to fortify their obviously weak argument they enlisted the help of Dr. John
  Wohlrabe. After responding to Dr. Wohlrabe's incorrect teaching on the subject in a
  series of five responses I was removed from the
  CAT41's mail list.
  In January 1999, I asked President A. L. Barry, at the Annual Symposium on the Lutheran
  Confessions at Fort Wayne, Indiana, if the LCMS had an official position on Church and
  Ministry. He responded that the Synod's official position on Church and Ministry was that
  taught by C.F.W. Walther and Francis Pieper in his "Christian Dogmatics."
  In defending the point that Walther only taught the LCMS should have congregations
  ruled by Voter supremacy, I quoted Walther, Pieper, Mueller, Mundinger, Fritz, and other
  official sources. Stefanski claims I cannot deal with the primary texts. Just the opposite
  is true. Wohlrabe reinvented the history of the LCMS to the point that he has no
  explanation as to why all LCMS congregations in the first century of the Synod were
  governed by supreme Voters' Assemblies. He won't even address it.
  Unable to deal with the historical record and the facts as published by the LCMS, the
  hundreds of LCMS pastors on CAT41 refuse to hear the truth or acknowledge its existence.
  They promote and defend the sacrament of ordination as a spiritual gift to the pastor.
  They seek to rewrite the history of the LCMS, redefine and alter what Walther taught, and
  reinstate pre-Waltherian European hierarchy. These hyper-euro-Lutherans want the privilege
  to attack me but then charge me as a thief and liar if I repeat what they say about
  Walther or myself.
  True to their love for Episcopal hierarch and being called "Father" instead
  of pastor, they see no need to debate someone who disagrees with them. Stafanski claims
  that Walther didn't see anything wrong with Episcopal hierarchy, hence a simple
  God-authorized banishment of Cascione will suffice. When the office of ministry becomes
  the indelible character of the office-holder the pastor's decision is God's decision. The
  freedom that many lay people enjoyed in the LCMS is coming to an end.
  The existence of hundreds of hyper-euro-Lutheran pastors and the monstrosity of their
  error has its source in the faculties of both Seminaries and their Boards of Regents. It
  is no longer necessary to agree with Walther's "Church and Ministry," and to
  defend Voter supremacy to be a pastor in the LCMS. In fact, the Seminaries are working
  hard to remove every vestige of the Synod's official position on this subject. Many LCMS
  pastors today do not understand Voters' Assemblies and/or are opposed to them. I have been
  labeled a false teacher for claiming that the Voters' are supreme, which is exactly what
  the constitutions of the four congregations I have served stated.
  Stefanski's statement of my removal from CAT41' TableTalk to the largest Lutheran mail
  list in the world, as he says it is, speaks for itself as follows:
  
    Quotation removed per author's request.