The following is a negative review of "How To Start Or Keep Your Own
  LCMS Church." The LCMS is now so pluralistic in its approach to church
  and ministry that in practice it really has no position on the subject. We
  thank Pastor Peter Dorn for his criticism. We also took the opportunity to
  reply.
  (The book sells for $5:00, plus $2.00 handling and
  shipping and can be ordered by calling 573-237-3110 or emailing cnmail@fidnet.com
  or reclaimnews@earthlink.net.)
  
  Dear Pastor Cascione,
  I received and looked over the book by you that was mailed ("How to
  start or keep your own Missouri Synod Church). I thought I would give you some
  feedback.
  Even though I disagree with much of what you write, I found much agreement
  with this book. The positive statements you made I agree with. I, too, grew up
  a Missouri Synod Lutheran and support the view of church polity that you
  espouse. So the question comes to my mind--what are we fighting so much for?
  I do have a couple of disagreements with the book. The first is that you
  are spending a lot of time and effort on something that in the Lutheran
  Confessions is considered adiaphora. Church polity has always been considered
  adiaphora. There is no one structure of the church, which has been given by
  God. Every structure you examine has flaws, including the one you espouse (and
  I agree with). The question is, does the structure help us promote the kingdom
  of God and the Gospel of Jesus Christ or not? This can change from generation
  to generation and culture to culture, as long as it does not hinder the
  preaching of the Gospel.
  My second disagreement has to do with the comments made about church
  growth. That seems to be everybody's punching bag right now. I have read a lot
  of church growth books, and do not recognize what I read in yours and other
  people's comments about church growth. The type of argument you are using
  seems to be the "straw man" argument, namely, to create a position
  and then knock it down. The problem with the "straw man" approach is
  that it does not adequately represent that against which you are fighting.
  What you are fighting is not what I am reading. I am sure you can find books
  that show what you are fighting against, but church growth covers a broad
  spectrum that is impossible to boil down to one thing. I disagree with much of
  what I read in church growth, but that does not make it all bad. Are you
  against the church growing? Don't you want to use all available tools that God
  has given us to advance the Kingdom of God?
  The positive statements you make I agree with. It is the negative
  statements that I have a problem with--because they do not adequately take
  into account the position you are fighting. If you would stop to really
  listen, perhaps you would not be so negative.
  Thank you.
  Rev. Peter Dorn
  
  Perhaps I don't understand Pastor Dorn's position. He writes: "I, too,
  grew up a Missouri Synod Lutheran and support the view of church polity that
  you espouse." Then he writes, "Church polity has always been
  considered adiaphora." Adiaphora means something neither forbidden nor
  required by Scripture. With his understanding of polity the Missouri Synod,
  itself, is an adiaphora.
  FIRST, Resolution 7-17 is hardly an adiaphora, as Pastor Dorn wishes to
  characterize the doctrine of Church and Ministry in the LCMS.
  
    Resolution 7-17 "To Affirm Synod's Official Position on Church and
    Ministry"
    Overture 7-39 (CW, p. 251) Whereas, The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod
    (LCMS) has experienced during its history confusion with regard to the
    doctrine of church and ministry; and
    Whereas, Dr. C. F. W. Walther addressed this confusion in 1851 through
    his Theses on Church and Ministry which was subsequently presented as the
    position of the LCMS in 1851; and
    Whereas, The book, "The position of our Church on the Question of
    Church and Ministry," by Dr. C. F. W. Walther was published in 1852 and
    adopted in 1854 by the LCMS in convention as the official position of the
    Synod; therefore be it
    Resolved, That the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod meeting in convention
    in the year of our Lord 2001 affirm the above referenced writings of C. F.
    W. Walther as the definitive statement of the Synod's understanding on the
    subject of Church and Ministry; and be it further
    Resolved, that the LCMS in convention re-affirm the decision of the
    convention in 1854, recognizing C. F. W. Walther's book, "The Position
    of Our Church on the Question of Church and Ministry," as the official
    position of the LCMS; and be it finally Resolved, That all pastors,
    professors, teachers of the Church and congregations honor and uphold the
    resolutions of the Synod as regards the official position of our Synod on
    Church and Ministry and teach in accordance with them.
  
  SECOND, whether or not Pastor Dorn agrees or disagrees with the polity of
  LCMS Congregations, as taught in Walther's "Church and Ministry," it
  is a position that he must teach as an LCMS pastor.
  THIRD, naturally Pastor Dorn feels that Church Growth is not given a fair
  hearing because it promotes a different polity than taught by Walther. The
  honest thing to do is to change the Synod's official doctrine on the subject
  before inventing his own polity. There is no way to implement Walther's
  "Church and Ministry" without a voters' assembly governing the
  congregation.
  If Walther's doctrine of "Church and Ministry" is a hindrance to
  growth then we have to ask if it is really the church that is growing?
  Of course, if the Convention votes against Resolution 7-17 the Missouri
  Synod will cease to exist.
  The June issue of the "Lutheran Witness" has a cover story titled
  "Why Some Pastors Quit." The authors would have us believe that the
  church will grow and the pastor will be happy if the people are nice. The
  article clearly abandons the doctrine of "Church and Ministry" and
  then searches for and explanation as to why things aren't working well in the
  congregation. The entire article is an exercise in absurdity and
  irrationality. Doctrine must be practiced, including church and ministry!
  Blessings,
  Pastor Cascione