A lot of people have different answers as to why Jerry Kieschnick was
  elected President over Dean Wenthe. This writer was informed by a Synodical
  Vice President, numerous pastors, faculty from Fort Wayne, and lay people that
  if the question of Church and Ministry had not been brought up Wenthe would
  have won. They blame this writer. They claim my opinions of Fort Wayne's views
  on Church and Ministry were neither fair nor accurate.
  It was never my intent to elect Kieschnick, the "Jesus First"
  candidate, President of the LCMS. I also promised not to speak about Wenthe
  after he was selected by the "United List," a promise I kept.
  Hindsight is more accurate than assumptions about the future. "Jesus
  First" was far more organized than the complacent "Balance" and
  "Affirm" whose lay support base has been eroding for the past nine
  years.
  Wenthe's selection by the "Untied List" was by a few people, in a
  closed room. No one was permitted to debate Wenthe's candidacy or promote a
  different candidate in any open meeting. No one who was openly opposed to
  Wenthe's candidacy was invited to meet with the "United List." When
  they lost they blamed this writer for the loss.
  Hartwig was removed on the first ballot. Had he been the choice of the
  United List he may have proved a far stronger candidate. Preus, whom we are
  told couldn't win a Synodical election by members of "Balance," was
  elected First Vice President while Wenthe failed to win enough votes to be
  elected as a Synodical Vice President (2 through 5).
  Was the issue of Church and Ministry worth risking a Synodical presidency?
  I didn't create the issue. I only reported it. Even in the July 2001issue of
  "For the Life of the World" Wenthe wrote on page 2, "The
  Scriptures and our Lutheran Confessions have rightly resisted portraying the
  pastoral office as 'above' the laity or possessing a special grace."
  However, he failed to say that the Lutheran Confessions say that the
  congregation is over the pastor. "In 1Cor. 3:6, Paul makes ministers
  equal, and teaches the Church is above the ministers." (Concordia Trig.
  Par. 11. 507) The Word of God is above the Church and the Church is above the
  ministers.
  Who kept the Fort Wayne faculty and Chairman of the Board of Regents from
  saying: "Of course we all agree with Voter Supremacy," "Of
  course the congregation is over the pastor," "Of course we agree
  with Walther that the voters are the 'final tribunal' in the
  congregation." "Of course, no one receives a spiritual blessing
  through the Sacrament of ordination" "Of course, a group of lay
  people can vote themselves into being a Lutheran Church Missouri Synod
  congregation"?
  No, they couldn't say these things. Rather, this writer and anyone who
  agrees with these positions was excoriated, berated, and called un-Lutheran by
  Fort Wayne faculty, students, and graduates for the past three years.
  The primary reason for promoting these issues was to give a theological and
  practical basis for telling congregations that the voters and not the pastor
  are the final authority on worship, hymnbooks, and catechisms. Therefore, the
  Church Growth and Pastoral Leadership Institute advocates of contemporary
  worship have no authority to change worship without a vote of the
  congregation. However, the hyper-euro-Lutherans don't agree that a voters'
  assembly have this authority. It is a lose-lose situation for the laity.
  When these issues were brought up three years ago, who knew that Wenthe
  would be a candidate for the LCMS presidency in April of 2001? It was former
  President Barry who told me privately and in public, that the Synod's official
  position on Church and Ministry was the same as C. F. W. Walther's.
  Where does this leave us with President Jerry Kieschnick? Regardless of
  what has been written, he is the choice of the Convention. He is entitled to
  his honeymoon with the Synod. He must be supported as the president of the
  Synod unless his words or actions prove beyond doubt that he is not worthy of
  our support.
  Publicly, his endorsement of the inerrancy of Scripture, his agreement with
  the Lutheran Confessions, his opposition to women clergy and condemnation of
  "Jesus First" are excellent. We all have to wait and see and give
  the man a chance to perform the duties to which he was duly elected. We hope
  that he also supports article VI of the LCMS Constitution that requires
  exclusive use of orthodox hymnbooks, catechisms, and agenda in church and
  school.