| 
    
       Woman Lobbies LCMS
      Commission About Removing 'Men' From Creed 
      By: Rev. Jack Cascione  | 
     | 
   
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
     | 
    
    Tammy Haga writes: 
     
    "I decided to call SP Kieschnick to see what he thought about the
    possibility of the word 'men' being taken out of the Nicene Creed.  I
    was informed that President Kieschnick will be either in meetings or
    traveling for the next several months and that getting a hold of him may be
    quite difficult.  I was then told that I could speak to his assistant.
    However, I was only able to leave a message since he also was busy. 
     
    Later that day I received a call from President Kieschnick's assistant who
    did not want to answer the question about the proposed change in Nicene
    Creed.  Kieschnick's assistant directed me to call the Commission on
    Worship. 
     
    While I was unable to get a hold of any of the leaders in the Commission on
    Worship, I was told by the secretary that the suggestion was brought up to
    omit the word 'men' from the Creed.  Recently however, they have been
    receiving a lot of phone calls rebuking this suggestion.  Because of
    this, the office of the Commission on Worship feels that the suggestion will
    not pass.  The meeting for the final decision will be held in two more
    weeks and will be posted on their website. 
     
    It seems calling does help matters.  Everyone should call them with
    their concerns about this issue.  If we don't speak up, I fear that
    their tampering with the Creed will go through.  Since this has not
    been voted on as yet, I would encourage people to call the Commission on
    Worship at 1-800-248-1930 and register their opinion" 
     
    ------------------------------ 
    Reclaim News Writes: 
     
    Changing the Nicene Creed from, "who for us men" into "who
    for us," introduces the acceptance of feminist theology and logic into
    our worship our understanding of who God came to save.  This must
    inevitably change the identity of Who came to save us. 
     
    Once we accept the premise that feminist theology is valid there is no way
    to argue against all its conclusions.  Either the entire Bible is the
    Word of God or it is not.  Either Jesus is true man and true God or He
    is not. Either all men fell because of Adam or they did not. 
     
    God did not say that Eve was the final cause of the fall, but that Adam was
    the final cause of damnation, even though Eve was also guilty.  Adam
    was ultimately responsible.  God does not hold Adam and Eve equally
    responsible because Adam, the man, is a higher human authority and has a
    higher responsibility before God than does Eve, the woman.  The Bible
    does not teach equality between men and women regarding their responsibility
    before God. 
     
    Romans 5:12 states: "Wherefore, as by one MAN sin entered into the
    world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all MEN, for that all have
    sinned." 
     
    The Bible teaches that all men fell because of Adam.  Adam brings the
    human race to the grave, not Eve, even though Eve also sinned.  If only
    Eve had sinned Adam had more ribs. 
     
    The first virgin birth was Eve born from Adam, hence in English it says
    "woman" or from the womb of man.  The great chiasm or
    reversal is that Eve came from a man; therefore Christ must come from a
    woman by virgin birth. The Bible leads us from Adam to Eve and then from
    Mary to Christ.  Christ is the new Adam. 
     
    As Adam was overcome by the devil with fruit from a live tree, so Christ
    overcomes the devil with his sacrifice on a dead tree.  Christ had to
    be not just human, but also a man. 
     
    The suggestion that the Nicene Creed can be changed because gender does not
    matter means that Christ's and Adam's gender are not significant.  All
    people are descendants of Adam, as was Eve.  Adam was set up by God as
    the earthly father-creator to be a reflection of God the heavenly
    Father-Creator. 
     
    The male gender is maintained in Roman's 5:12 in order to demonstrate the
    total salvation achieved by Christ.  The phrase, "who for us
    men" must be maintained in order to confess God's order of creation and
    salvation.  The Christian religion must not be brought down to the
    level of a pagan, female fertility cult. 
     
    Without the male gender, Roman's 5:12 would read: "Wherefore, as by one
    person (man) sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death
    passed upon all people (men), for that all have sinned." 
     
    Yes, all people sin but men bear the greater responsibility because Adam was
    created first.  Jesus is true man, not just true person! 
    "Who for us men" ultimately signifies all people, but also
    maintains the more complete explanation that the sin committed by the one
    male has been removed from all the males and consequently all people. 
    By one man came sin and by one Man came salvation. 
     
    The relationship before God between Adam and Eve is to be maintained between
    husbands and wives until the end of time. 
     | 
     | 
   
 
November 19, 2002  |