| 
    
     PROPOSED RESOLUTION NOT TO LET STATUS AND PRIVILEGE
    OVERRIDE TRUTH IN THE CHURCH
     
    Whereas, the Commission on Constitutional Matters (CCM)
    has ruled that the "Constitution and Bylaws of the Synod do not allow
    or contemplate the expulsion of a member of the Synod on the basis of an
    action taken with the full knowledge and approval of the appropriate
    ecclesiastical supervisor" (02-2296, Reporter, March 2003, p. 10); and
     
    Whereas, this ruling flatly contradicts Holy Scripture,
    which repeatedly warns against "respect[ing] persons in judgment"
    (Deut 1:17; see also Eph. 6:9, Col. 3:25, James 2:1,9), "making the
    word of God of none effect through [human] tradition" (St. Mk. 7:13),
    or "teaching for doctrines the commandments of men" (St. Mk. 7:7),
    and insists that "we must obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29);
    and
     
    Whereas, the CCM ruling is incompatible with the
    Lutheran Confession, which
     
     -- teach
    that "it is not lawful for a human being to repeal an obligation that
    is plainly a matter of divine right" (Augsburg Confession XXVII, 24;
    Kolb-Wengert, p. 85);
     
     -- make the
    "marks" of the church all-decisive, namely "the pure teaching
    of the gospel and the administration of the sacraments in harmony with the
    gospel of Christ"--not the whim or discretion of "supreme external
    monarchy" of ecclesiastical supervisors (Apology VII/VIII, 3; p.
    174-184);
     
     -- warn
    against those who "demand that their traditions be observed more
    carefully than the gospel" (Apology XXVIII, 3; p. 289);
     
     -- deny
    that texts like St. Lk. 10:16 and Heb. 13:17 grant ecclesiastical
    supervisors any authority beyond the Gospel itself (Apology XXVIII, 17-21,
    pp. 291-292);
     
     -- reject
    as "also purely religious raving [enthusiasm]" the claims of the
    chief of all ecclesiastical supervisors, "in that the pope boasts that
    'all laws are in the shrine of his heart' and that what he decides and
    commands in his churches is supposed to be Spirit and law—even when it is
    above or contrary to the Scriptures of the spoken Word. This is all the old
    devil and old snake, who also turned Adam and Eve into enthusiasts and led
    them from the external Word of God to 'spirituality' and their own
    presumption . . . It is the source, power, and might of all the heresies,
    even that of the papacy and Mohammed" (Smalcald Articles 
    III/8/4,5, 9; pp.322, 323);
     
     -- treat as
    a "mark of the Antichrist" the fact that a notorious
    ecclesiastical supervisor "is not willing to be judged by the church or
    by anyone else and places his authority above the judgment of councils and
    of the whole church. To refuse to be judged by the church or by anyone is to
    make himself God." Further: [Forbidding judicial inquiry] "does
    more harm than any cruel act. For when the church has been deprived of valid
    judicial process, it is not possible to remove ungodly teachings and impious
    forms of worship, and they destroy countless souls generation upon
    generation . . . Since, however, judgments of the councils are judgments of
    the church, not of the pontiffs, it is wholly appropriate that rulers
    restrain the wantonness of the pontiffs and ensure that the power to examine
    and to make judgments according to the Word of God is not snatched away from
    the church" (Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope, 40, 51, 56;
    pp. 337, 339);
     
     --
    recognize no privileged "official" zone of immunity from the
    normal demands of truth; quite on the contrary: "We also believe,
    teach, and confess that in a time when confession is necessary, as when the
    enemies of God's Word want to suppress the pure teaching of the holy gospel,
    the entire community of God, indeed, every Christian, especially servants of
    the Word as the leaders of the community of God, are obligated according to
    God's Word to confess true teaching and everything that pertains to the
    whole of religion freely and publicly. They are to do so not only with words
    but also in actions and deeds" (Formula of Concord, S.D., X, 10; p.
    637); and
     
    Whereas, the CCM ruling makes a mockery of the
    Synodical constitution by, in effect, amending Article VI, Condition of
    Membership, as follows:
     
     "2.
    Renunciation of unionism and syncretism of every description, such as: a.
    Serving congregations of mixed confession, as such, by ministers of the
    Church--UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY THE APPROPRIATE ECCLESIASTICAL SUPERVISOR;
     
    b. Taking part in the services and sacramental rites of
    heterodox congregations or of congregations of mixed confession—UNLESS
    AUTHORIZED BY THE APPROPRIATE ECCLESIASTICAL SUPERVISOR;
     
    c. Participating in heterodox tract and missionary
    activities-- UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY THE APPROPRIATE ECCLESIASTICAL SUPERVISOR;
    etc." and
     
    Whereas, since "Christians can be ruled by no
    other means than by God's Word alone" (Luther, cited in C.F.W. Walther,
    Church and Ministry, p. 316), the Missouri Synod was intended to rely on
    God's Word alone, not on human authority and regulations:
     
    Also our synodical body has the same prospects of
    salutary influence if it does not attempt to operate through any other means
    than through the power of the Word of God. Even then we must expect battles,
    but they will not be the mean, depressing battles for obedience to human
    laws, but the holy battles for God's Word, for God's honor and kingdom . . .
    [Otherwise] our chief battle would soon center about the execution of
    manufactured, external human ordinances and institutions and would swallow
    up the true blessed battle for the real treasure of the church, for the
    purity and unity of doctrine (C.F.W. Walther, First Presidential Address,
    Concordia Journal, vol. 2, no. 5 [Sept. 1976] p.202);
     
    All government of the Church which does not bind the
    consciences of Christians to Christ's Word, but to the word of men, is
    pseudo-government (Pieper, Dogmatics II:394);
     
    Resolved that the LC-MS in convention assembled in 2004
    rejects and overturns the CCM ruling in question, and declares it null and
    void and of no further effect.
      | 
     |