| 
     Confessing the Athanasian Creed is the way we know we
    are keeping the correct faith in the Trinity and Christ and our thus keep
    our eternal salvation.
     
    There is a significant penalty
    in the LCMS for those who challenge false doctrine about the Trinity.
     
    At this time, it is a much
    greater struggle to oppose false doctrine about the Trinity than for those
    who publish the false doctrine.
     
    On 
    Sunday, June 24,
    2001
    , I published a Reclaim News article exposing Werning’s false doctrine
    about the Trinity which he sent to every 2001 LCMS Convention delegate.
    
    
     
    Werning called the Redeemer Lutheran Church Office on
    
    Monday, June 25, 2001
     and said, 
    “This is a declaration of war,” and he also said, “I’m going
    to file charges against you.
    
    
     
    For the next year, Werning blitzed the officers of 
    
    Redeemer
     
    Lutheran
     
    Church
    
     with false
    accusations and character assassination against their pastor. 
    He was determined to change their minds to a false definition of
    Christ
    
    
     
    Werning quickly rallied enthusiastic support from The
    South Wisconsin and the Texas District Presidents to defend his published
    heresy about the Trinity.  Officers
    from the South Wisconsin District wrote open letters that claimed my
    criticism of Werning’s doctrine about the Trinity was a violation of the
    Eighth Commandment.  Additional
    pastors and Synodical officers including the former Chairman of the COP, Dr.
    John Heins, openly joined in supporting Werning’s lies about God. 
    Heins was actually one of Werning’s witnesses.
    
    
     
    Regretfully, in the LCMS today, politics, cronyism,
    and personal friendships, carry more weight than correct doctrine.
    
    
     
    Thus far, criticism of Werning’s false teaching has
    resulted in hundreds of pages of letter and two years of lies, threats,
    intimidation, meetings, technicalities, and Synodical bylaw jingoism, with
    no end in sight.
    
    
     
    We have to wonder how a layperson would have any
    opportunity of preventing the spread of Werning’s lies about God.
    
    
     
    To this day, Werning refuses to admit that each
    Person of the Trinity is the whole, complete, and entire God, apart from
    whom there is no other God.
    
     
    He refuses to admit that God’s actions are one
    action, not three communications, three realities, three revelations, three
    beings, and three experiences.
    
     
    He refuses to admit that all of God, that is the
    entire essence died on the cross in Jesus Christ. 
    Werning wants to know if God died on the cross, then whom was Jesus
    talking to from the cross.  Werning
    states that asking if Jesus is God or one third of God is a philosophical
    question, not an article of faith.
    
     
    He questions how God could be dead in the tomb for
    three days.
    
    
     
    If, as Werning believes, there are extra parts of
    God, outside of Jesus Christ, then our prayers in Jesus’ name are not to
    God because God cannot be divided.
    
    
     
    No less than the current Synodical President has come
    to Werning’s assistance.
    
    
     
    In a public memo to the COP and Board of Directors,
    President Kieschnick published that I was being charged with breaking the
    Eighth Commandment.  The rule
    about not publishing information about the charges doesn’t apply to the
    LCMS President.
    
    
     
    If I’m guilty of breaking the Eighth Commandment,
    then Werning is telling the truth about God.
    
    
     
    If pointing out doctrinal error in the LCMS in now a
    violation of the Eighth Commandment that means that Jesus Christ sinned
    against Caiaphas, the Apostles sinned against the Sanhedrin, Luther sinned
    against the Pope, and God has sinned against the devil.
    
    
     
    But let’s be realistic. 
    The Synodical President isn’t really concerned one way or the other
    about Werning’s doctrine of the Trinity. 
    Practically speaking, the one who complains about false doctrine
    commits a far greater offence than the one who teaches it.
    
    
     
    The Voters of Redeemer Lutheran Church invited Werning
    to their voters’ Assembly.  Werning
    responded with the following quotations on 
    December 5, 2001
    
     
    “The Redeemer Church resolution only compounds the
    sins of your Pastor, Rev. Jack Cascione, but now makes you (the voters)
    guilty by agreeing with and defending him in his disobeying of God’s Word
    by breaking of Matthew 18, and the 8th Commandment as he holds public court
    against me as your victim, who has at the meeting and who was totally
    misrepresented and lied about in his statements about me to you.”
     
    Werning keeps teaching that I have broken Matthew 18 by
    complaining about his false doctrine.  In
    other words, he reserves the right to publish false doctrine but those who
    complain about it in public are personally attacking Werning. 
    An attack on Werning’s doctrine, is an attack on his person.
     
    Werning believes that doctrine is also about himself
    and objective truth rests in his person. 
    In other words, if Werning writes that the moon is made of green
    cheese and a critic publicly disagrees, Werning will claim a violation of
    the Eighth Commandment and the Synodical President will publish the charges.
     
    Again Werning writes to 
    
    Redeemer
    
    Lutheran
    
    Church
    
    on 
    Dec. 5, 2001
    :
     
    “You will see that your Pastor has consistently
    disobeyed God’s Word and LCMS practices based on the Bible . . .”
     
    “Please note that your pastor is a ‘lone ranger’
    public accuser who has failed to and refused to follow God’s word . . .” 
     
      |