| 
    
       The Trinity: In Defense
      of the Correct Definition of God in the LCMS 
      By: Rev. Jack Cascione  | 
     | 
   
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
     | 
    
    Are there three different works or actions in God or one? A growing number 
    of LCMS officials and Pastors are supporting Doctor Waldo Werning's claim of 
    three revelations, communications, experiences, realities, and "manners
    of 
    being" in God.  Those who disagree with Werning are being charged
    with 
    breaking the Eighth Commandment. However, Luther claims that God's actions 
    are one work not three, as follows: 
     
    "He [Jacob] does not say: 'May They bless,' using the plural number.
    Nor 
    does he [Jacob] repeat.  No, he joins the three Persons in the one work
    of 
    blessing - God the Father, God the Shepherd, and the Angel. 
    Accordingly, 
    these three are one God and one blesser.  The Angel does the same work
    that 
    the Shepherd and the God of his Father does." (Footnote 12 This
    Trinitarian 
    interpretation of the Gen. 48:15-16 goes back in the exegetical tradition at 
    least as far as Athanasius, Discourse Against Arians, III, 12.) (Luther's 
    Works AE Vol. VIII, Page 164) 
     
    "As shown above, each Person possesses the entire divine essence as
    well as 
    the divine attributes and works, which do not exist in three 'sets,' but 
    only one 'set.' In other words, each Person in the Deity is the entire God, 
    and not a third of God.  Luther:  'Of these Persons each one is
    the entire 
    God, outside which [Person] there is no other God.'  And the Christian 
    congregation sings with Luther in the 'battle hymn of the Reformation': 
    'Jesus Christ it is . . . And there's none other God.'" (Pieper Vol.
    I:390) 
     
    Werning claims that the Catechism divides the work of God into God the 
    Creator, God the Redeemer, and God the Sanctifier.  He does not
    comprehend 
    the difference between the "opera ad extra" (external works of the
    Trinity) 
    and the "opera ad intra" (internal works of the trinity). South
    Wisconsin 
    District President Ron Meyer and now Texas District President Lindermann 
    agree with Werning.  God's identity is no longer primary issue for the 
    operation of these districts. 
     
    However, Pieper explains as follows: "Does not the Apostles' Creed
    ascribe 
    to each Person a special "opus divinum ad extra": (divine external
    work) to 
    the Father, creation; to the Son, redemption; to the Holy Spirit, 
    sanctification?  Does not the second part of Luther's Small Catechism 
    actually mislead Christian people to a 'naive tritheism' by dividing the 
    divine works among the three Persons?  This objection to the Church's 
    terminology does not rest on fact.  In the first place, no orthodox
    teacher 
    speaks of a division and distribution of the opera ad extra unless the 
    tongue or the pen has slipped.  Furthermore, while the Church uses the
    terms 
    attribution and appropriation, it does not use the term distribution." 
    (Pieper Vol. I:422) 
     
    Again Pieper explains: "The 'opera ad extra' (external works) are
    common to 
    all three Persons because each of the Person has the divine essence entirely 
    and indivisibly.  In relation to the creatures (ad extra), each Person
    has 
    the same attributes and the selfsame works." (Pieper Vol. I: 423) 
     
    The following quotation alone proves that Werning is a false teacher. 
    "Viewed absolutely, the works of creation tell us nothing of a Triune
    God 
    because every work is the work of the one God." (Pieper Vol. I: 423) 
     
    "When we confess in the Creed, 'I believe in God the Father,' etc., we
    do 
    not mean to say that only the Father is almighty, the Creator, because we 
    believe that also the Son and the Holy Spirit are the Creator.  Yet
    there 
    are not three Almighties, as little as there are three Saviors, or three 
    Sanctifiers, though the Father the Holy Spirit are also our Redeemer, and 
    the Father and the Son are also our Sanctifier." (Pieper Vol. I: 424) 
     
    Werning teaches that there is more of God out side of Jesus Christ.  In 
    other words, Jesus is not the whole, complete, entire God. 
     
    If Jesus Christ is not the entire, whole, complete God, that the following 
    verse is false and the Jehovah Witnesses are correct:  "'The Son
    is the one 
    and only God' 1John 5:20": (Koehler "A Summary of Christian
    Doctrine" page 
    32)  "Each person of the Godhead is the entire God (totus
    Deus)." (J.T. 
    Mueller "Christian Dogmatics" page 148)  According to
    Cassell's "New Latin 
    Dictionary" (1960) "totus" means "whole." 
     
    How much of God is in Christ? Luther writes: "The entire Holy Trinity
    is 
    known in the Person of Christ." (LW 23:89) 
     
    Pieper tells us that every person of the Trinity is fully God, not one third 
    of God, yet there is only one God (Vol. I: 385, 386, 390, 405).  Thus,
    we 
    read in TLH hymn 154, verse 3, 'When God the Mighty Maker died' not 'When 
    one third of God the Mighty Maker died!'" 
     
    "Of these Persons each one is the whole God, besides whom there is no
    other 
    God." (Luther, J. T. Muller Christian Dogmatics CPH page 148). 
    According to 
    Merriam Webster's "New Collegiate Dictionary" (1949) the first
    definition of 
    "all" is "the whole of." 
     
    "Without controversy, great is the mystery of godliness, that God was 
    manifest in the flesh." 1Tim. 3:16, (not a part of God manifested in
    the 
    flesh). 
     
    The Athanasian Creed states, "There is one Almighty, not three
    Almighties." 
    The Son is Almighty and we may not divide the substance.  God can never
    be 
    less than all of God. 
     
    "That is to say, Scripture bears witness that the three persons and the 
    entire Trinity are the one true God, and that each person is perfectly and 
    in all respects that one true God." (Martin Chemnitz, "Loci
    Theologici" CPH 
    1989, Page 74, and 75) 
     
    "Next to the article of the Holy Trinity this is the greatest mystery
    in 
    heaven and on earth, as Paul says: 'Without controversy, great is the 
    mystery of godliness, that God was manifest in the flesh, 1Tim. 3:16.' For 
    since the Apostle Peter in clear words testifies (2 Peter 1:4) that we also, 
    in whom Christ dwell only by grace, on account of that sublime mystery, are 
    in Christ, 'partakers of the divine nature,' what kind of communion of the 
    divine nature, then, must that be of which the apostle says that 'in Christ 
    dwelt all the fullness of the Godhead bodily,'(Col. 2.9) so that God and man 
    are one person?" (The Formula of Concord, Thor. Decl. VIII. Of the
    Person of 
    Christ, par. 33-34 Concordia Triglotta, page 1027.) 
     
    What if Werning is correct when he claims that God did not die on the Cross? 
    The Confessions say: "But if I believe that only the human nature
    suffered 
    for me, then Christ would be a poor Savior for me, in fact, He himself would 
    need a Savior" (Solid Declaration of Lutheran Confessions. Trig. Page
    1027) 
     
    "Dr. Luther says also in his book Of the Councils and the Church: We 
    Christians must know that if God is not also in the balance, and gives the 
    weight, we sink to the bottom with our scale. By this I mean: If it were not 
    to be said [if these things were not true], God has died for us, but only a 
    man, we would be lost. But if 'God's death' and 'God died' lie in the scale 
    of the balance, then He sinks down, and we rise up as a light, empty scale. 
    But indeed He can also rise again or leap out of the scale; yet He could not 
    sit in the scale unless He became a man like us, so that it could be said: 
    'God died,' 'God's passion,' 'God's blood,' 'God's death.' For in His nature 
    God cannot die; but now that God and man are united in one person, it is 
    correctly called God's death, when the man dies who is one thing or one 
    person with God. Thus far Luther." (Formula of Concord, Article VIII,
    Par 
    44, Concordia Triglotta pages 1029-1030) 
     
    "Now, since He [Christ] is such a man as is super naturally one person
    with 
    God, and apart from this man there is no God. . ." (Formula, Thor. Decl. 
    VIII Of the Person of Christ Concordia Triglotta Par. 81, 1045) 
     
    The Lutheran Confessions also speak of Christ as: "God," "the
    Son of God," 
    "Jesus Christ," "The Word," that is the Second Person of
    the Trinity, etc. 
    All of these descriptions about Christ are correct and not contradictory. 
     
    The Athanasian Creeds states: "So the Father is God, the Son is God,
    and the 
    Holy Ghost is God. And yet they are not three Gods, but one God." 
     
    "That is to say, Scripture bears witness that the three persons and the 
    entire Trinity are the one true God, and that each person is perfectly and 
    in all respects that one true God."  (Martin Chemnitz, "Loci
    Theologici CPH 
    1989, Page 74 and 75) 
     
    Pieper, Chemnitz, and the Lutheran Confessions quote Luther's Treatise on 
    the Last Words of David (LW15).  Again and again they support Luther's 
    teaching that apart from any Person of the Trinity there is no God. 
     
    "You may say very correctly of the Dove: That is God, and there is no
    God 
    beyond that one." LW15:304 
     
    "You may say very correctly of this Voice: That is God, and there is
    not God 
    beyond that." 
    LW15:305 
     
    "You can say very correctly of the Man: That is God and there is no
    other 
    God beside him." 
    LW15:305 
     
    "However, it is also correct to say that God died for us, for the Son
    is 
    God, and there is no other God but only more Persons in the same
    Godhead." 
    LW15:310 
     
    As Lenski says: "'The fulness of the Deity' can, of course, never be 
    divided.  Wherever it dwells, 'all' of it dwells." (Commentary on
    Colossians 
    page 101) 
     
    As I conclude this document, the tragedy is that most a many LCMS will ask 
    the themselves, "I wonder who is right, Werning or Cascione or does it 
    really matter?" 
     
    However, if you read the Athanasian Creed, there is no excuse for ignorance: 
    It states: "Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary
    that 
    he hold the catholic [i.e., universal, Christian] faith.  Which faith
    except 
    everyone do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish 
    everlastingly." 
     | 
     | 
   
 
June 7, 2003  |