| 
    
       Episcopal Church Elects
      Gay Bishop and Canadians Endorse Gay Marriage 
      By: Rev. Jack Cascione  | 
     | 
   
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
     | 
    
    In this Article: 
    1. Commentary From Reclaim News 
    2. New Hampshire Episcopalians Choose Gay Bishop, and Conflict according to 
    New York Times 
    3. Episcopal Church Website Announces Election of Gay Bishop 
    4. Episcopal Church Cannon Law on the Election of A Gay Bishop 
    5. New York Times Editorial Celebrates Canadian Gay Marriage 
    --------------------------------------- 
     
    1. Commentary From Reclaim News: 
    When people, an entire church body, or a government gives up God's law, 
    homosexuality is the inevitable consequence.  Romans 1:21 reads:
    "Because 
    that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were 
    thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was 
    darkened." 
     
    The world, church, or any individual has no definition for self-existence 
    without God, including gender orientation. Gay marriage is impossible 
    because the definition of marriage must include two members of the opposite 
    sex. 
     
    The election of a gay Episcopal bishop shows their worship about man instead 
    of God.  Rather than true worship, church members participate in mortal
    sin. 
     
    Notice how apostate churches leads governments to embrace homosexuality. 
    If 
    God's word is be distorted, why shouldn't men be distorted with desire for 
    intimacy with other men as a sign of their hatred for God's word? 
     
    Notices the elaborate Cannon Law the Episcopalians have invented to 
    legitimatize homosexual clergy and bishops.  They dress their
    abomination in 
    the church's finest robes and offices. 
     
    With its new rulings, the LCMS's CCM is also developing and expanding LCMS 
    "Cannon Law."  The LCMS Constitution is now interpreted and
    reinterpreted 
    through a labyrinth of interconnected rulings to justify worship with 
    Moslems and ecclesiastical immunity for the LCMS president.  CCM
    rulings are 
    now sited as a higher authority than the Bible in the LCMS, as in the Benke 
    case. 
    ---------------------------------- 
     
    2. New Hampshire Episcopalians Choose Gay Bishop, and Conflict 
        New York Times National Desk | June 8, 2003, Sunday 
     
    By LAURIE GOODSTEIN (NYT) 1393 words 
    Late Edition - Final , Section 1 , Page 1 , Column 1 
    LEAD PARAGRAPH - Episcopalians in the Diocese of New Hampshire today elected 
    as their leader the first openly gay bishop anywhere in the worldwide 
    Anglican communion, a step likely to roil the church in the United States 
    and England, and deepen the disaffection of the more conservative Anglican 
    churches in Africa, Asia and Latin America. 
    The bishop-elect, the Rev. Canon V. Gene Robinson, who had developed a loyal 
    following here in 16 years as assistant to the current bishop, was elected 
    from among four candidates on the second round of balloting at St. Paul's 
    Church. 
    ------------------------------- 
     
     
       2003-125 
    3. Canon Gene Robinson elected bishop coadjutor of New Hampshire 
    http://www.episcopalchurch.org/ens/2003-125.html 
     
    BULLETIN 
    (ENS) The Rev. V. Gene Robinson was elected bishop coadjutor of the 
    Episcopal Diocese of New Hampshire today on the 2nd ballot. 
     
    Robinson is the first openly gay man in the Episcopal Church to be elected 
    as a bishop. 
    The other nominees were: the Rev. Ruth Lawson Kirk, rector of St. Peter's 
    Church in Glenside, Pennsylvania; the Rev. Canon Pamela Mott, pastor at 
    Trinity Cathedral in Portland, Oregon; and the Rev. Robert Tate, rector of 
    St. Martin-in-the-Fields parish in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. A fifth 
    nominee, the Rev. Joe Goodwin Burnett, was elected bishop of Nebraska in 
    May. 
     
    The leadership of the national Episcopal Church now must ratify Canon 
    Robinson's election during the General Convention, meeting in Minneapolis in 
    late July. Both the House of Bishops and the House of Deputies will need to 
    approve his election by a two-thirds majority. 
     
    Robinson has served as canon to the ordinary in New Hampshire since 1988 
    where he coordinates diocesan staff and ministry of the current bishop, the 
    Rt. Rev. Douglas E. Theuner. Since 1983, Robinson has served as executive 
    secretary of the Episcopal Province of New England, and since 2001 on the 
    Board of Trustees of the General Theological Seminary in New York City. 
     
    A 1969 graduate of the University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee, he has a 
    B.A. in American Studies/History. In 1973, he completed the M. Div. at 
    General Theological Seminary; after ordination he served as curate at Christ 
    Church, Ridgewood, New Jersey. Upon moving to New Hampshire in 1975, 
    Robinson co-owned and directed an accredited girls' summer camp and horse 
    farm. As founding director of Sign of the Dove Retreat Center in Temple, New 
    Hampshire, he facilitated spiritual direction and designed programs for a 
    variety of groups. He also managed the diocesan Living into Our Baptism 
    program of spiritual growth and development. 
     
    Robinson enjoys entertaining and cooking, gardening, music, and running. The 
    father of two grown daughters, Jamee and Ella, he lives with his partner 
    Mark Andrew, employed by the N.H. Department of Health and Human Services. 
     
    ----------------------------------------- 
     
     
    4. Episcopal Church Cannon Law On Election of Bishop 
    A summary of TITLE III, CANON 22: 
    Of the Election and Ordination of Bishops 
    If the date of the election occurs within 120 days before a meeting of the 
    General Convention, the Standing Committee of the Diocese shall forward to 
    the Secretary of the House of Deputies evidence of the election of the 
    Bishop-elect by the Convention of the Diocese, together with evidence that 
    the Bishop-elect has been duly ordered Deacon and Priest, evidence of 
    acceptance of election, and a testimonial signed by a constitutional 
    majority of the Convention, a summary of biographical information relating 
    to the Bishop-elect, and certificates from a licensed medical doctor and 
    licensed psychiatrist, appointed by the Ecclesiastical Authority with the 
    approval of the Presiding Bishop, that they have thoroughly examined the 
    Bishop-elect as to that person©^s medical, psychological and psychiatric 
    condition and have not discovered any reason why the person would not be fit 
    to undertake the work for which the person has been chosen. Forms and 
    procedures agreed to by the Presiding Bishop and the Church Pension Fund 
    shall be used for this purpose. 
     
    The Secretary of the House of Deputies shall present the testimonials to the 
    House, and if the House consents to the ordination of the Bishop-elect, 
    notice of its consent shall be sent to the House of Bishops. 
     
    If a majority of the Bishops exercising jurisdiction consent to the 
    ordination, the Presiding Bishop shall notify the Standing Committee of the 
    Diocese electing and the Bishop-elect of the consent. 
     
    Upon receipt of the consents and assurance of the acceptance of the election 
    by the Bishop-elect, the Presiding Bishop shall take order for the 
    ordination of the Bishop-elect either by the Presiding Bishop or the 
    President of the House of Bishops of the Province of which the Diocese 
    electing is part, and two other Bishops of this Church, or by any three 
    Bishops to whom the Presiding Bishop may communicate the testimonials. 
     
    In case a majority of all the Standing Committees of the Dioceses do not 
    consent to the ordination of the Bishop-elect, the Presiding Bishop shall 
    declare the election null and void and shall give notice to the Standing 
    Committee of the Diocese electing and to the Bishop-elect. The Convention of 
    the Diocese may then proceed to a new election. 
     
    No person shall be ordained Bishop unless the person shall at the time, and 
    in the presence of the ordaining Bishops and congregation, subscribe to and 
    make the declaration required in Article VIII of the Constitution. 
     
    Constitution, Article VIII Declaration: 
     
    No person shall be ordained and consecrated Bishop, or ordered Priest or 
    Deacon to minister in this Church, unless at the time, in the presence of 
    the ordaining Bishop or Bishops, the person shall subscribe and make the 
    following declaration: 
     
    I do believe the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments to be the 
    Word of God, and to contain all things necessary to salvation; and I do 
    solemnly engage to conform to the Doctrine, Discipline, and Worship of the 
    Episcopal Church. 
     
    Summary of Constitution, Article III 
    No one shall be ordained and consecrated Bishop until the attainment of 
    thirty years of age; nor without the consent of a majority of the Standing 
    Committees of all the Dioceses, and the consent of a majority of the Bishops 
    of this Church exercising jurisdiction. But if the election shall have taken 
    place within three months next before the meeting of the General Convention, 
    the consent of the House of Deputies shall be required in place of that of a 
    majority of the Standing Committees. No one shall be ordained and 
    consecrated Bishop by fewer than three Bishops. 
     
    A Bishop shall confine the exercise of such office to the Diocese in which 
    elected, unless requested to perform episcopal acts in another Diocese by 
    the Ecclesiastical Authority thereof, or unless authorized by the House of 
    Bishops, or by the Presiding Bishop by its direction, to act temporarily in 
    case of need with in any territory not yet organized into Dioceses of this 
    Church. 
     
    -------------------------------------- 
     
     
    5. New York Times Editorial June 19, 2003 
    "Canada's Celebration of Marriage" 
    http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/19/opinion/19THU1.html?th 
     
    The landmark ruling came down from the north with some of the simple delight 
    of a June wedding announcement: "Same-sex couples are capable of
    forming 
    long, lasting, loving and intimate relationships." In unanimously
    affirming 
    the obvious, an Ontario appeals court opened the way for Canada to end the 
    bar on marriage between partners of the same sex. Final approval of a 
    milestone law striking down discrimination against gay couples is expected 
    within months. But the northward flow by gay couples from the United States 
    has already begun. Canada has no residency requirements for love-struck 
    people intent on marriage, while Belgium and the Netherlands enacted tighter 
    restrictions in pioneering legal gay unions. 
     
    When they head home after the vows and rice, the newlyweds will expect to be 
    treated as legally married people here, as will gay Canadian couples 
    visiting the United States. They should get that respect, both out of simple 
    decency and because this nation has a long history of recognizing legal 
    marriages performed across borders. 
     | 
     | 
   
 
June 22, 2003  |