| 
    
       Why Was The LCMS
      Unprepared For Election of A Gay Episcopal Bishop? 
      By: Rev. Jack Cascione  | 
     | 
   
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
     | 
    
    Instead of "How Great Thou Art," the Episcopal Church is now
    singing, "How 
    Gay We Are."  Their lay people are proud to be Americans but
    ashamed to be 
    Episcopalians. 
     
    The Missouri Synod President and District Presidents have known for many 
    years that the leaders of the Episcopal Church and Evangelical Lutheran 
    Church are sexual deviates and/or openly promote sexual promiscuity and 
    homosexuality. 
     
    Where is the article in just one issue of the Lutheran Witness or Reporter 
    that warns anyone in the LCMS about these facts?  Now, after the entire 
    country has been made aware of this reality by the public press, LCMS 
    President Kieschnick writes as follows on August 7, 2003: 
     
    "As President of The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod, I am profoundly 
    saddened and deeply disturbed by the decision of the Episcopal Church U.S.A. 
    to give its approval to the election of an openly homosexual bishop." 
     
    The ELCA is in communion fellowship with the Episcopal Church and is 
    preparing to vote on the acceptance of homosexual pastors. 
     
    The following statement was issued from a gathering of 40,000 ELCA Youth in 
    Atlanta on July 28, 2003: "Delegates also adopted a resolution
    supporting 
    the blessing of 'same-sex unions' and the ordination of 'non-celibate 
    individuals' of 'all sexual orientations' in 'committed
    relationships.'" 
     
    Many LCMS District Presidents advocate that LCMS congregations serve 
    communion to members of the ELCA and help congregations remove pastors who 
    will not serve communion to members of the ELCA. 
     
    At the 1998 LCMS Convention, I watched the Florida Georgia District 
    President make three attempts to convince the Floor Committee why his 
    district should take communion with other Lutherans.  He had broad
    support 
    from clergy in California, Washington, New York, Minnesota, and Michigan, 
    and many other District Presidents.  Make no mistake, the LCMS Council
    of 
    District Presidents is very much aware of the ELCA's and the Episcopal 
    Church's affinity for sexual promiscuity and homosexuality. 
     
    It is time for LCMS laity to face some hard realities.  It is not
    possible 
    for members of the LCMS COP to promote open communion with those who 
    advocate homosexuality without themselves being advocates of sexual 
    promiscuity and or homosexuality.  They may be in the closet now, but
    when 
    the opportunity presents itself, they will come out. 
     
    The liberal movement, led by Dr. John Tietjen in 1969-74, attempted to 
     "free" the LCMS from the supposed legalism of Biblical
    inerrancy and a 
    literal interpretation of the Lutheran Confessions. 
     
    The liberals' questions about the historicity of Adam and Eve, Jonah, the 
    virgin birth, the resurrection, etc., were pointless unless their goal was 
    the acceptance of sexual promiscuity and homosexuality. 
     
    In 1974, Dr. John Tietjen led 450 St. Louis Seminarians, 45 professors, and 
    300 LCMS congregations from the LCMS to what is now the ELCA and the 
    "blessing of 'same-sex unions' and the ordination of 'non-celibate 
    individuals' of 'all sexual orientations' in 'committed
    relationships.'" 
     
    We should not be surprised that whose who reject God's word will inevitably 
    promote sexual freedom.  Every time in the Old Testament the children
    of 
    Israel rejected God's word, they joined their neighbors in sex-based 
    worship.  People have not change.  Moses went up the mountain and
    the 
    Children of Israel had an orgy. 
     
    Conservatives are not immune to sexual sin, but they don't teach it is a 
    "blessing," no more than David was proud of his adultery. 
     
    Total usurpation of all church power by Episcopal Bishops has resulted in 
    the abandonment of God's word and the love for sodomy.  The Bible tells
    us: 
    "Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of
    their 
    own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves: Romans
    1:24" 
     
    Pastor Elder McCants has pointed out that President Kieschnick didn't quote 
    one Bible passage to support his comments about the Episcopal Church in his 
    August 7, 2003 news release. 
     
    During his stormy two years as LCMS President, Kieschnick has made every 
    effort to change the "culture" in the LCMS, attack LCMS
    conservatives, and 
    prevent an "over purification of doctrine" in the LCMS, in the
    cause of 
    evangelism.  Is the LCMS supposed to grow like the ELCA? 
     
    In nearly every other church body except the LCMS, the proponents of clergy 
    hierarchy are liberal and gay. 
     
    The odd politics of the Missouri Synod find a division between conservative 
    minded hyper-Euro Lutherans and liberals.  Just the opposite is true in
    the 
    in the ELCA and the Episcopal Churches where those who promote the sacrament 
    of ordination and the is-there-really-a-God liberals are united. 
     
    Liberal theology, Episcopal hierarchy, and the Contemporary/Church Growth 
    Movement all place man at the center of worship and inevitably lead to the 
    advancement of sexual freedom and homosexuality. 
     
    This is President Kieschnick's dilemma at the 2004 LCMS Convention.  He
    is 
    caught between warming up to the ELCA who loves Episcopal hierarchy and the 
    sacrament of ordination, while battling those who love the same practice in 
    the LCMS. 
     
    How did LCMS political wires get crossed?  The LCMS pits lovers of
    Baptist 
    style, contemporary worship and corporate hierarchy against those who 
    believe the pastor becomes a living communion wafer through the sacrament of 
    ordination and rules the congregation like the Pope.  The history of
    this 
    strange political division would take pages of explanation.  Yet,
    that's how 
    it is in the LCMS. 
     
    But this is merely a transitional phase.  All man centered worship,
    whether 
    sacerdotal (the pastor is a priest between God and the congregation), 
    contemporary, or liberal, must lead to sexual promiscuity and homosexuality. 
    The LCMS sacerdotalists, liberals, and Christian rockers will eventually 
    discover they have more fellowship under the sheets than at the communion 
    rail. 
     
    The following quote was printed in the lead article of the August 5, 2003 
    New York Times, "'It's a great day for the church,' the Rev. Sandye
    Wilson 
    of the Minnesota Diocese said. 'This is a church which has finally 
    understood that men and women created in the vision of God can be the 
    guardians of the faith - and be gay or lesbian.'" 
     
    The ultimate choice is not conservative or liberal but conservative or gay. 
    Christ says at the end of the world it will like the days of Noah and Sodom. 
     
     | 
     | 
   
 
August 8 , 2003  |