| 
    
       Review of the Movie
      "Luther" by Paul T. McCain, Head of CPH 
      by Paul T. McCain  | 
     | 
   
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
     | 
    
    The lights go down and the screen stays black. Then there is the pounding 
    noise of thunder, growing louder and louder, the screen lights up with a 
    burst of lightening, and we see a man running across an open field. The 
    bolts of lightening crash all around and one strikes the ground right next 
    to him. He falls face down in mud, crying out in absolute terror, "Save
    me, 
    St. Anne. I'll become a monk. Save me! Save me!" It is so realistic you
    feel 
    like ducking under your seat and making a few promises of your own. So 
    begins "Luther" the new movie on the life of the Reformer. It will
    be 
    released this Fall, September 26, in 300 theatres, in 55 major urban areas 
    across the country, with more to come following throughout the rest of the 
    year. 
     
    From the storm, we see Luther becoming a monk, then it moves to Luther 
    celebrating his first mass, trembling in fear at the moment of consecrating 
    the elements of Holy Communion. The movie continues with scene after scene 
    in the life of the younger Luther. It pulls you in and keeps the drama and 
    action moving to the very end. 
     
    The years covered are July 1505 to June 1530. This is the greatest challenge 
    for the movie. It may also be a chief criticism of it. How is it possible to 
    fit these twenty-five tumultuous years into a space of less than two hours? 
    Is there too much to make sense? What has to be left out? One can only 
    imagine the agonizing decisions that had to be made in the process. 
     
    This is my only concern with the movie. Is it too much for the audience to 
    follow?  I am concerned that in fact so much is packed in that the
    movie 
    might tend to be a bit confusing. I may very well be wrong. Various focus 
    groups of all ages indicated how they were thoroughly captivated by the 
    movie and consider it dramatic, moving and exciting. One young lady of 22 
    said that she can't wait to see it again and will gladly pay to do so this 
    time. Another person involved in distributing films professionally in 
    Hollywood, California said after seeing the movie, "This is the
    Lutheran 
    Braveheart!" 
     
    The movie is stunning, dramatic, powerful and beautiful. For a Lutheran, the 
    movie is intensely emotional. The movie takes a few liberties with the 
    sequence of certain events and even some details, for the sake of making 
    sense out of things for the viewer. Where the movie does portray an actual 
    event and relate actual details the level of fidelity to the actual history 
    is remarkable and powerful. I come away in awe at the level of detail and 
    historical accuracy, far more than I expected or even hoped for. 
     
    The acting is very well done by the lead, Joseph Fiennes, who portrays 
    Luther as a young monk and then younger man, gaunt from his monastic life, 
    profoundly intense and passionate about the spiritual care of souls, both 
    his own and others. Those who play supporting roles in the film do a very 
    fine job. All very authentic and believable, communicating through voice and 
    expression, the entire range of human experience. 
     
    Does the Gospel come through in this movie? Absolutely, yes. Would I have 
    appreciated more? Yes, absolutely. Let me hasten to add that it was 
    breathtaking to hear the Gospel come through as clearly as it did, when it 
    did. A major Hollywood distributor said that he loved the movie and wanted 
    to distribute it, but he had one condition. He asked for all the
    "Christ 
    stuff" to be taken out.  It wasn't. Thank goodness. I appreciate
    how the 
    movie revolves around the theological issues, and doesn't make Luther out to 
    be a social revolutionary or champion of free speech or any of the assorted 
    other misunderstandings of Luther that are often offered up (PBS special!) 
     
    The movie shows Luther's progress in realizing how, in Christ, God is a 
    loving heavenly father, not the harsh judge who is appeased only though 
    works of piety on the part of the faithful. I would have appreciated a bit 
    more than what the movie did, but I cannot help but be thankful for the 
    Gospel that is in the movie. There is no question that it is Christ whom 
    Luther discovered. 
     
    The movie had to choose which major events leading to the Diet of Augsburg 
    to show. They therefore chose to leave out the Heidelburg Disputation, the 
    Leipzig Debate and did not deal with the Sacramentarian controversy. I can't 
    fault them for these decisions. Again and again, when I think to criticize, 
    I ask myself, "But what could they have done in two hours that they
    didn't 
    do?" I think the decisions on what to feature and what not to include
    were, 
    overall, wise. I'm not sure I agree with a fictitious scene early in the 
    movie, but for dramatic effect, it was included. 
     
    This is a movie, not a documentary. That is a key point to keep in mind. 
    Ironically, however, it makes the Luther documentary broadcast on PBS this 
    summer look rather anemic, particularly, and most importantly, when it comes 
    to the articulation of the Gospel. 
     
    "Luther" does a marvelous job portraying the problems of the
    church in the 
    16th century; the scenes of Luther's visit to Rome and then the selling of 
    indulgences by Tetzel are absolutely brilliant. They use a fictitious woman 
    and her child to bring home the personal impact of the sale of indulgences 
    and Luther's very pastoral response. 
     
    The costumes, location work, and cinematography are stunning. The historical 
    accuracy is also impressive. For example, Lucas Cranach's paintings are seen 
    in the elector's palace. The relics on display are very authentic looking, 
    the costumes show the stark contrast between the "haves" and the
    "have 
    nots." Those who are aware of these details will appreciate the depth
    of 
    detail in the movie. The movie was filmed on many locations throughout 
    Europe and therefore the movie has a level of realism and authenticity that 
    is very impressive. 
     
    The movie shows Luther's multifaceted personality, warts and all. The depth 
    of his spiritual anguish is shown in disturbing reality, as he writhes in 
    spiritual, emotional and mental torment, contemplating a God whom He can 
    never make love Him and a Devil constantly seeking to devour Him. It is 
    painful to watch. Do we take matters this seriously? But then we see the 
    bold, confident man of faith, clinging to the Word, standing up courageously 
    for what the Word of God teaches about Christ and salvation. 
     
    The movie ends with a dramatic portrayal of the courage of the princes of 
    the German territories at Augsburg informing Emperor Charles V of their 
    decision to defend the teachings of Luther. 
     
    We can be thankful that the movie does not pander to "political
    correctness" 
    but shows the reality of those years and the faults and failings of all 
    concerned. Politicians are shown to be shrewd and wise, but also men of 
    faith and conviction. Peter Ustinov as Luther's faithful defender, Elector 
    Frederick is simply a delight. He masterfully shows Frederic moving toward 
    supporting Luther and then defending him and then embracing his beliefs. The 
    movie takes liberties with history to show Luther meeting Frederick and 
    presenting him a copy of the Bible in German, a powerful moment in the film. 
     
    The movie has not yet been assigned a rating. One would imagine that it will 
    be a PG-13 movie. The scenes of death in the movie are graphic. There are no 
    battle sequences, but the results of the peasant war are graphically 
    presented, along with several images of hangings. This is not a movie for 
    younger children, nor should it be. The portrayal of violence is necessary 
    to show just how powerful an impact the results of Luther's work and its 
    misinterpretation were. 
     
    Luther is portrayed as uttering a vulgarity when in the midst of spiritual 
    torment, a term then that was very common. It may disturb some to recognize 
    just how human Luther was, but should it? This movie is dealing with 
    reality, not fantasy. I applaud the producers for showing us just enough, 
    but not too much. Some may disagree. The bottom line is that if one is 
    looking for a "G" rated movie, that presents an idealized picture
    of things, 
    one would be better served by sticking with the 1950s era Luther movie in 
    black and white. Reality in full color is something quite better, in my 
    opinion, in more ways than one. 
     
    Reflecting on the movie, it would be easy to quibble and find fault with all 
    sorts of things; however, does the movie deliver a dramatic and engaging 
    portrayal of Luther and his work? Yes. Does it articulate the Gospel? Yes. 
    Does it articulate it clearly enough? Perhaps not, nor as often as we would 
    like, but yet, clearly, it is Christ to whom Luther is pointed and to whom 
    He clings for hope and salvation. Christ is named and is the focus of 
    Luther's work. It is remarkable that they got the Gospel as right as they 
    did. Those looking for a "docu-drama" may be disappointed, for
    there is 
    simply no way a movie that is slightly less than two hours can deliver that. 
     
    This reviewer left the movie theater inspired, uplifted and profoundly moved 
    by the power of this movie. It encouraged me to dig more deeply into 
    Luther's writings, and Luther biographies. It brought many aspects of the 
    man Luther to life and lifted him from a cold printed page to a living, 
    human reality. Of course, it is still a movie, but the opportunity to view 
    things in this manner has greatly increased my interest in learning even 
    more about Luther. I have spent most of my professional life studying Luther 
    and reading Luther and this movie did not leave me disappointed. For those 
    who know little about him, I am sure they will be fascinated as well. 
     
    The goals of this movie were to provide a motion picture that would attract 
    interest and present a powerful moment in history, a moment of high drama, 
    with action and emotion to bring audiences in, and then, once there, to give 
    them a chance to meet Martin Luther, and have a sense of what he went 
    through. It is that interest that we can capitalize on to help people learn 
    more about Luther and his beautiful exposition of the Gospel. 
     
    I am convinced that this movie really will open doors for people interested 
    in Lutheranism, wanting to learn more about Martin Luther, his life and his 
    work. What a great opportunity for Lutheran congregations! It will provide a 
    valuable tool for years to come to help portray the essential truths of the 
    Lutheran Reformation. Many thanks are due Thrivent Financial for Lutherans 
    for seeing this project through to completion. 
     
    It will be released on DVD sometime in February 2004, after running its 
    course in the theatres in the USA and Europe. 
     
    Concordia Publishing House has a companion book that will be released in the 
    coming weeks, a very clear, direct and simple biography that will fill in 
    many gaps and articulate much more clearly the essential truths the movie 
    covers. I'll provide more information on that later. 
     
    Cordially in Christ, 
    Rev. Paul T. McCain 
    Concordia Publishing House 
    St. Louis, Missouri 
     | 
     | 
   
 
July 19 , 2003  |