| 
    
       LCMS BOD versus Kieschnick and The COP 
      By: Rev. Jack Cascione  | 
     | 
   
  
     | 
    The LCMS Board of Directors (BOD) has hired the Bryan Cave
      Law Firm for a 
      legal opinion about recent Commission on Constitutional Matters (CCM) 
      decisions being in conflict with Missouri Law, where the LCMS is 
      incorporated. 
       
      Cave informed the BOD that recent rulings by the CCM placing President 
      Kieschnick above the BOD are against Missouri Law and jeopardize the
      Synod's 
      Articles of Incorporation.  This implication is that the LCMS BOD
      doesn't 
      meet the requirements for a BOD under Missouri Law.  Under Missouri
      Law, no 
      entity or officer in the corporation may have more authority than the BOD. 
       
      The BOD operates as the Synod when the Synod is not in Convention. 
      The 
      Convention is the final authority.  A flaw in the LCMS Constitution
      gives 
      the LCMS President authority to appoint people to the CCM without the 
      Convention.  The conflict has never become apparent until recent CCM
      rulings 
      defended Kieschnick's actions in the Benke Case and claimed the President
      is 
      not accountable to the BOD or subject to removal by the BOD.  Under
      Missouri 
      Law, the CCM can only be advisory to the BOD.  The LCMS is actually
      in 
      jeopardy of loosing its non-profit status under Missouri Law if officers
      and 
      commissions can act in defiance of the BOD. 
       
      These CCM rulings invalidate the BOD's previously unquestioned 
      constitutional authority to administer the funds and property of the LCMS, 
      including its Colleges, Seminaries, and Districts. 
       
      The Concordia University System (CUS) has accumulated more than 203
      million 
      dollars in long-term debt to the LCMS.  CUS continues to bleed red
      ink and 
      the BOD is legally bound to prevent Synodical bankruptcy.  At the
      same time, 
      the Districts are spending more funds on themselves and giving fewer funds 
      to the Synod. 
       
      While the BOD struggles to control mounting Synodical debt, President 
      Kieschnick, his political allies in "Jesus First," and the
      Council of 
      District Presidents (COP) have a different approach.  Potentially,
      the Synod 
      could count billions more in assets and borrow addition 100s of millions. 
       
      By broadening the definition of Synodical assets, the Synod could borrow 
      more 100s of millions.  At the moment, the Synod is not counting the
      Pension 
      and Church Extension funds and Congregational property in its ratio of
      debt 
      to assets.  The BOD is currently working with about a billion dollars
      in 
      assets, including campuses and office buildings, as a ratio against 203 
      million dollars of debt. 
       
      At present, the BOD is preparing for a major court battle and its officers 
      have voted to indemnify themselves.  According to Texas District
      President 
      James Lindermann, (Kieschnick's right hand man) the COP or others will 
      consult legal council and challenge the Cave legal opinion. 
       
      Lindermann writes: "The implication in this [BOD] document that a new 
      direction will be followed in the governance of our Synod is a matter of 
      utmost importance to all of us. I am sure that there will be requests for 
      other legal opinions on the subject. The Council of Presidents will be 
      meeting Saturday-Wednesday." 
       
      Notice that Lindermann calls historic BOD authority, "a new
      direction."  The 
      COP believes the Districts have more authority than the BOD.  In
      political 
      terms, the COP is in the process of a coup.  Recent "Jesus
      First" propaganda 
      sent to all LCMS congregations, describe the COP as the congregations,
      best 
      friend. 
       
      The COP has been draining the Synod of funds.  In the current fiscal
      crisis, 
      if the Synod goes into bankruptcy, the Districts will probably become 
      independent or only affiliated entities of the Synod.  At the moment,
      under 
      Missouri Law, the BOD is claiming constitutional authority to control 
      Synodical and District property and the right to remove officers without 
      cause, authority that the CCM now claims the BOD doesn't have. 
     | 
     | 
   
  
     | 
    
     | 
     | 
   
 
September 17, 2003  |