On February 11-15, 1999, Pastor Jack Cascione of Redeemer
Lutheran Church in St. Clair Shores, Michigan, spoke at three locations in the LCMS Texas
District. Some of the major goals of the trip were to alert LCMS lay people of the urgency
to adopt two resolutions at the 2001 LCMS Convention. These resolutions propose the
reaffirmation of Walthers "Church and Ministry" and returning all LCMS
District Presidents to full-time service in the parish. Other goals were to alert the lay
people of the immanent threats to their congregations from "Faith Inkubators",
"The Church Growth Movement", "Leadership Training", and Pastoral
Leadership Training (PLI), all promoted by the Council of District Presidents.
Lutheran attorney Jim Runzheimer and engineer Ralph Tate made all the arrangements for
me to speak on Reclaiming the Gospel in the Texas District at a rented hall
in Arlington Texas on February 11th. I also spoke in San Antonio on Feb. 12th, and Houston
on Feb. 14th in two other rented halls.
Runzheimer was concerned that the District Office be given an opportunity to respond to
some of the points I was going to address. Runzheimer sent 10 basic questions about his
concerns to the Texas District President and Vice Presidents by return receipt.
I promised Runzheimer that they would not answer the questions which is why I wanted
them sent return receipt. Runzheimer was skeptical, to say the least, and thought I was
prejudging the President and four Vice Presidents. I responded that the Texas office would
never answer me because I live in a different District. Furthermore, my own Michigan
District Board of Directors also refuses to respond to my letters so why should it be any
different for Runzheimer in Texas? The following are the questions sent by Runzheimer to
the Texas District President and Vice Presidents.
Questions for the Texas District
President, Vice Presidents, and Executive Staff
In view of Rev. Jack Casciones book Reclaiming the Gospel in the LCMS
which speaks about the problems with Church Growth, Leadership Training, Pastoral
Leadership Institute (PLI), Promise Keepers, abandonment of traditional worship in many
Texas District worship services, abandonment of Lutheran hymnbooks, Luthers Small
Catechism, and the Lutheran Agenda in violation of Handbook Article VI.4, abandonment of
Walthers "Church and Ministry" as the one and only position practiced in
the LCMS, promotion of an undefined relativized Gospel, and the confession of manufactured
creeds and statements of faith in place of the three Ecumenical Creeds, would you please
promptly answer the following questions with a yes or no.
Please Check One:
- (yes) (no) I support Walthers Church and Ministry as the only correct teaching and
practice for all Texas District Congregations.
- (yes) (no) I oppose the confession of any manufactured creeds and statements of faith in
place of the three Ecumenical Creeds in all Texas District Congregation worship services.
- (yes) (no) I believe that the Apostles and Nicene Creeds are correct statements of
the Gospel of Jesus Christ and agreement with them, without addition or deletion, is
necessary for membership in the LCMS.
- (yes) (no) The only way to heaven is by faith in the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
- (yes) (no) I insist on the name "Lutheran" on all Texas District Congregations
and mission congregations.
- (yes) (no) In accordance with Handbook Article VI.4, I advise all Texas District
Congregations that they must practice exclusive use of Lutheran hymnbooks, Luthers
Small Catechism, and Lutheran Agenda in Church and School.
- (yes) (no) I oppose the marketing, management, and business philosophy taught by Peter
Drucker and the Leadership Network becoming the practice of LCMS congregations.
- (yes) (no) I oppose the restructuring of LCMS congregations promoted by PLI that turns
the pastor into a CEO and places a Board of Directors over the affairs of a Voters
Assembly as a replacement to the polity taught by C.F.W. Walther.
- (yes) (no) I oppose the changes being introduced into congregations by PLI that were
announced in 1997 because the Synod was not allowed to vote on it in Convention in 1998.
- (yes) (no) I oppose so-called "contemporary worship" because it has no
definition and therefore cannot qualify as worship or church practice in any sense of the
term and because it is little more than the product of the ministers religious
fantasies.
The full text of Runzheimers introductory letter will be in an article titled Dallas
Attorney Wants Answers from Texas District LCMS. The full text of the letter sent
from the Texas District Office to Jim Runzheimer that explains why they will not answer
his questions in print will be published in an article titled, Letter Signed by
Texas District President and Four Vice Presidents Refuses To Answer Questions.
There is an old song called the "The Big Rock Candy Mountain." One verse goes
"On that big Rock Candy Mountain, You can ride a horse, its your own of course,
and youre so high your daddy cant reach you." The Texas District
President and Vice Presidents all signed a letter that they would not offer any written
answers to questions about the Gospel, Creeds, or Walther and more. Just because member
congregations sent in more than 8 million dollars to the Texas District Office in 1997
doesnt mean the District President and Vice Presidents have to answer any questions
in writing about what they believe, teach, and practice to any Lutheran layman.
Surprisingly, Runzheimer received an answer, more than I have received here in Michigan
or from the English District. He received a letter signed by the Texas District President
and all four Vice Presidents explaining why the Texas District President and the Vice
Presidents would not answer his questions. To say the least Runzheimer was astonished.
In each of the three locations, after I spoke on the topic Reclaiming the Gospel
in the Texas District, A Texas District Vice President was present to challenge
what I said about the practice of "Church Growth" congregations in Texas
rewriting the Creeds, making up their own gospel, promoting Bill Hybles and Willow Creek,
and refuting any quotation of District financial statistics published in the Lutheran
Annual. Most Texas lay people will confess any creed, statement of faith, or liturgy the
pastor makes up and never ask what happens to the $8.7 million going to the District
Office. I also distributed a copy of the 10 questions the Texas District Office refused to
answer when I spoke.
In Arlington/ Dallas/Forth Worth
Vice President Joeckel announced to the 110 people present that he would not answer any
written questions. He said he would be glad to meet privately and discuss them but he
would not answer them in print. I asked what about questions on the Creeds, the Gospel and
Walther? He said he would not answer them but would talk about them privately. He also
said felt there was nothing wrong with the creeds and confessions of faith in the Texas
District. Two examples of bogus confessions of faith reproduced from Texas congregational
bulletins were shown as exhibits in each location and are published in the article titled Texas
District Vice President Confused On Which Creeds to Confess.
Joeckel said all of the financial statistics and numbers of people "at the
District Office" about Texas, reproduced from the Lutheran Annual were wrong. He
accused me of erroneous information. He defended a Willow Creek/Bill Hybles conference
endorsed by the District at Bethel Lutheran Church.
In San Antonio
Vice President Linderman insisted that no one was publishing and confessing any of
their own creeds in the Texas District. I then offered a bulletin from Prince of Peace
Lutheran Church with its own creed published in it. Linderman said this was the first time
that he heard or seen of such a thing in Texas. The assembly laughed openly. I asked if I
were the first person to ever show him such a thing. He agreed and the assembly laughed
again. Linderman said all the financial statistics and numbers of people "at the
District Office" from the Lutheran Annual were wrong.
In Houston
Vice President Black said he did not sign any questions about doctrine because that has
never been his practice for 40 years. He said he would be glad to talk about the questions
face to face. When I asked him if he would sign any statement about what he believed when
we meet together and he said would never sign any statement. A pastor in the audience
responded this was all very interesting because the District Office expects pastors to
fill out PIF forms and answer extensive questionnaires about every aspect of their
doctrine and practice. However, the Texas District Office refuses answer any questions
about what it believes and practices.